Original Work Wednesday

On Wednesdays, starting in June, I’m going to do the crazy scary thing of putting up original work on Wednesdays. Luckily, Jacqueline has said she will delve into this adventure with me, which makes me feel like someone is holding my hand as we jump off of a cliff… so thank you, Jackie. I haven’t decided yet if I’ll keep comments closed, or just ask that people engage in conversation about the pieces rather than criticism (it’s more of a chance to get used to having my – and others’ – work in a public forum rather than having it critiqued). If you are a regular friend of the blog (i.e. someone who visits frequently and is involved in the community here) and would like to be part of this experiment (either because you’d like a platform for your work, or because you, too, need to spread your wings a bit), e-mail me or use the contact form on the About Page to contact me.

Until June, I’m going to repost some of my favorite work that I’ve done for Book Riot; the pieces that are a bit more personal and prose-like, which don’t always get the most number of views or shares (I find that easy, short, highly illustrated articles get circulated the most – but they’re not always my favorites to write). We’ll call this a warm up, shall we?

Feel free to comment (I don’t want to have discouraged you in the previous paragraph). I’d love to chat with you about how you feel about the topic below.

*****

(This piece was originally published here.)

Why What You’re Reading Matters

by: Wallace Yovetich

d73b91779971974facf9829e5f3261d7

I went through a phase, a few years back, when all I was reading was what we call Chick-Lit. I started becoming increasingly unhappy, and therefore kept reading more of this genre; it was a vicious cycle. Before I go on, let me explain what I mean by Chick-Lit. I am referring to the fluffiest of these books. The ones that tend to be formulaic and are usually based around the protagonist finding her perfect job, perfect mate, perfect weight, and perfect life by the last page.

Someone finally asked me what I had been reading lately and I told her. Well, there’s your problem, she responded. What? How could that possibly be my problem? I was sad, therefore I was reading about people who were not sad. I was reading about situations that end happily – I was CHEERING MYSELF UP, DAMN IT. No, she explained, you are making yourself feel bad. Try reading something else, something a little heavier, a little more realistic. Challenge yourself.

So I picked up Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall.

The next time I spoke to this person she asked me how I was doing, and if I had changed anything about what I was reading. I told her that I wasn’t exactly feeling happy, but I had certainly been distracted by reading Mantel’s tome, which required me to do a good amount of Internet research along the way.

Read another thinker, she said.

So I did.

And eventually, after a few (some fiction, some non-fiction), I got the point; if not in my head then in my heart. I started realizing that though some of these books were depressing, they were real. That life doesn’t always turn out the way we want it to, and not everyone’s path looks the same. These are things that I fundamentally knew, but had forgotten while inundating myself with stories of people who lived cookie cutter lives with fairy tale-istic endings. And I started noticing that the people I talked to, who were also reading these books, were much more likely to disclose things in their lives that wouldn’t fit into any book equivalent of a romantic comedy – if only because we were lighting our conversation off of a spark from whatever book we were talking about.

In a later conversation with the friend who had encouraged me to change my reading habits, what I had noticed in my heart seeped into my head; reading books that show what life is really like doesn’t make anything in your life worse than it was before; instead, it shows you how very not alone we are, and how very unrealistic our expectations can be when we surround ourselves in a culture that only represents an ongoing, unrealistic happiness – whether that be in the form of movies, books, art, or music.

I looked at my bookshelves recently. Some of the specific genre titles are still there, they are wonderful for the times when I need some mindless entertainment (which, by the way, still happens more than occasionally). But mostly I see books about real things – some titles I only let my eyes flicker over because I know that what’s in their pages is heartbreaking and scary, but I also know that they’re there when I need them; sitting and waiting to have a conversation with me about how life isn’t always fair and is often not beautiful, but is always rich and very, very real.

Happy Monday!

7f196bfc76edfbbed6c4e904d367b58c

Happy Monday everyone! I drove to and from LA a couple of times this week, so got some good “reading” time in (listening to The Other Typist). It’s definitely starting to pick up (not that it was slow – I was just getting to know the characters). So far, I recommend it… will let you know more when I’m done.

Am also really loving The Hound of the Baskervilles. If you are not reading it along with us this month, I highly suggest picking it up. It’s a very quick and engaging read.

Who recommended Life After Life to me (I’m blanking)? I bought it and am very excited to start it as soon as I’m done with The Round House.

What have you been reading lately?

P.S. Do we LOVE that caricature of Joan Didion? I do.

The Hound of the Baskervilles :: Week Three

Welcome to the read-a-long of The Hound of the Baskervilles! We’re reading this book through May. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

hound-basker

Week Three: Read to Chapter X

Discussion:

“As you look at their gray stone huts against the scarred hillsides you leave your own age behind you, and if you were to see a skin-clad, hairy man crawl out from the low door fitting a flint-tipped arrow on the string of his bow, you would feel that his presence there was more natural than your own.” This is kind of how I’m feeling about the moors right now. CREEPY!

What’s going on with the Stapletons? Is she really his sister? Their relationship is creepy, and I think something else is going on there… anyone else?

Any guesses about what the cry on the moor is? Jacqueline has stated that Doyle doesn’t write about supernatural things, so we know that there is a logical solution to this. What is it? I have no guesses.

Who was the tall, think person on the moor towards the end of the reading? Not Barrymore? Has the Barrymore issue been completely resolved? I’m not convinced.

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
readerlane
sarahdulitz
Mary Ann
benking
Muriel Kranowski
Nancy
jackiemania
Amanda Briggs
Julie Ruark
Cindy
Ashley
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Melissa Caldwell
threewhales
kai charles (@YogiKai)
Lara Newell
Tahleen
Diane Miller
Maria
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Riv @ Bookish Realm
chezjulie
Jeni Lannen
ebookclassics
PiaM
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
Vicki
Judy
thetruebookaddict

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


Dan Brown’s Inferno… Do or Don’t?

17212231

Most people have a solid opinion about Dan Brown in general and whether they are going to read his latest book, Inferno, in particular. I am absolutely, for sure going to ingest this book. Whether it will be in print or by audio is the only question. I listened to Angels and Demons and it was fantastic (I was riveted). I read The Da Vinci Code and enjoyed it. I listened to The Lost Symbol and it was, eh… ok. But no doubt these books are entertaining, even if at a declining rate.

So will you be reading it? Anyone vote for listening? Or are you totally against Dan Brown and his new book?

Happy Monday!

32a993143874dfd8dd1d4a4649ea7520

Happy Monday everyone! The above picture is for me to remember about finding the perfect book (and numerous other things as well). Thought it might be fitting for a Monday morning.

So, I started The Other Typist… almost through the first disc – so far so good. I’ve also started reading The Round House by Louise Erdrich. I know I’m not on the read-it-early cool wagon, but I tend to let that wagon pass me by for the this-has-been-tried-and-tested wagon. The book is wonderful. It sucks you in, and if I had the brain power, or time, right now, I’d have finished it already. As it is, I’m thoroughly enjoying lingering in it. I’ll let you know if this feeling continues as I’m sure you’re all on the edge of your seats waiting to know. ;)

Of course, I’m also reading The Hound of the Baskervilles for the read-a-long. People, I highly recommend this book – such fun! Not only is it really easy to get into, it’s also easy to read. It has a good plot, humor, and enough intrigue to keep you wanting more.

What have you been reading?

The Hound of the Baskervilles :: Week Two

Welcome to the read-a-long of The Hound of the Baskervilles! We’re reading this book through May. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

hound-basker

Week Two: Read to Chapter VII

Discussion:

Quick Note: I updated the reading schedule on the Starting Post. Silly me, I put that we are to read to Chapter V for next week, I meant Chapter X (i.e. STOP when you get to Chapter X). Sorry about that!

Halloa! THAT is going to be my new word people. Is this word still used? How have I never heard it?

Do we think Sir Doyle originally thought Holmes was going to be such a verbal character, or do we think that came from explaining the character’s reasoning when he first wrote him and worked that into the character? Loving it, by the way.

Can we take a field trip to Baskerville Hall??? I’m dying to go! Anyone else having Wuthering Heights flashbacks? In my head, this estate looks very similar to Heathcliff’s. I’m going to have to change the draperies or something to make sure I keep them separate.

Do we think Barrymore is telling the truth; that he and his wife are leaving because they are sad… too many sad memories? I want to believe them, am I naive?

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
readerlane
sarahdulitz
Mary Ann
benking
Muriel Kranowski
Nancy
jackiemania
Amanda Briggs
Julie Ruark
Cindy
Ashley
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Melissa Caldwell
threewhales
kai charles (@YogiKai)
Lara Newell
Tahleen
Diane Miller
Maria
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Riv @ Bookish Realm
chezjulie
alexandrap529
Jeni Lannen
ebookclassics
rahul
PiaM
ramblingreader
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
Vicki
Judy
thetruebookaddict
sawcat

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


New Audio Books

16115612

16158600

This week I received a box full of wonderful audio books from Penguin. These two are the ones that I am most excited to listen to. Have you read either yet? Are you planning to? Can you believe I haven’t read anything by Khaled Hosseini? I’ve heard he’s incredible, but, I admit, I’m a little nervous about how sad his work sounds – including this one. The Other Typists looks intriguing… like maybe it could be a page turner (if there were pages in my version).

Have you listened to any great audios lately?

Happy Monday!

e16c11b8182b99b0517f8779448f8a8f

Happy Monday everyone! How was your weekend? Any good reading time? I’m still reading the same books I was last week… all of them, and therefore making very little progress on any of them. How are you all coming along with the books you are reading?

I’m dying to find something to read that I CANNOT put down. My problem is that there is no formula that works for me; there isn’t a specific genre (or even author) who always works for me because so much of what I read on any given day really is about the mood I’m in, or (to be cheesy) the relationship that I’m in with the book – aka, if it comforts me/inspires me/thrills me when I read it. Does this happen to you too? Any suggestions?

The Hound of the Baskervilles :: Week One

Welcome to the read-a-long of The Hound of the Baskervilles! We’re reading this book through May. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

hound-basker

Week One: Read to Chapter IV

Discussion:

I have only read one Sherlock Holmes book (and by read I mean listened to the BBC version on audio). I had no idea Watson was the narrator, or (quite frankly) that there was humor in it. Guess that didn’t come across in the performance (or maybe the one I read – I think the first one – didn’t have the humor that is at the beginning of this one?). Therefore, I pretty much consider this my introduction to  Holmes and Watson.

I love the set up. I’m intrigued with the story. I find the humor wonderful. Basically, I’m into it (and I would like to see if Holmes does actually start getting into a box to contain his thoughts).

How are you feeling on the outset of this adventure?

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
readerlane
sarahdulitz
Mary Ann
benking
Muriel Kranowski
Nancy
jackiemania
Amanda Briggs
Julie Ruark
Cindy
Ashley
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Melissa Caldwell
threewhales
kai charles (@YogiKai)
Lara Newell
Tahleen
Diane Miller
Maria
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Riv @ Bookish Realm
chezjulie
alexandrap529
Jeni Lannen
ebookclassics
rahul
PiaM
ramblingreader
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
Vicki
Judy
thetruebookaddict
sawcat

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


What I’ve Been Reading…

a024c5ce8aabfa014c283038808cbef6

Happy May to all of you! Since I used Monday for the read-a-long sign ups for The Hound of the Baskervilles, I wanted to catch up with you today about what you’re reading.

I’ve finished Love Song for Jonny Valentine. My conversation about it with fellow Book Rioter, Greg, will be up on the Book Riot site soon. (Hint: one of us really liked it and the other one didn’t.)

I’ve attempted and attempted to get into Beautiful Creatures. It will grab me for a few pages and then I get bored. Has anyone else tried this and had the same reaction? All I hear is love for it.

I’ve started The White Album by Joan Didion and OH MY GOD, I love it. I’ve only ever read snippets of her work, and now I want to read everything (or at least all of the non-fiction). The woman reading it (did I mention I’m listening to it while going back and taking notes in my hard copy?) sounds just like my beloved Nora Ephron, so I can’t tell if I’m biased or not… I’m hoping not (or maybe just a smidgen).

Also, I had started The Art of Fielding in March, got about four pages in and put it down to start something else that needed to be read and there it sat, UNTIL I was prompted to pick it up again by A who is listening to it. Now he is waaaaay past me and my goal is to catch up (which I won’t be able to but has gotten me to start reading and pronto) and now I’m quite into the book. It was THE BOOK last year, so plenty of you have probably read it. I’m a little over 100 pages in so far and, like everyone else says, you do not have to love baseball to read this book; it doesn’t hurt, but it’s not only about that. It’s also about reading, and learning, and hard work, and friendship… at least so far.

And today, I will be picking up The Hound of the Baskervilles to read the first 20 pages which we will discuss on Friday.

What are YOU reading, thinking of reading, just finished reading?