What I’ve Been Reading…

a024c5ce8aabfa014c283038808cbef6

Happy May to all of you! Since I used Monday for the read-a-long sign ups for The Hound of the Baskervilles, I wanted to catch up with you today about what you’re reading.

I’ve finished Love Song for Jonny Valentine. My conversation about it with fellow Book Rioter, Greg, will be up on the Book Riot site soon. (Hint: one of us really liked it and the other one didn’t.)

I’ve attempted and attempted to get into Beautiful Creatures. It will grab me for a few pages and then I get bored. Has anyone else tried this and had the same reaction? All I hear is love for it.

I’ve started The White Album by Joan Didion and OH MY GOD, I love it. I’ve only ever read snippets of her work, and now I want to read everything (or at least all of the non-fiction). The woman reading it (did I mention I’m listening to it while going back and taking notes in my hard copy?) sounds just like my beloved Nora Ephron, so I can’t tell if I’m biased or not… I’m hoping not (or maybe just a smidgen).

Also, I had started The Art of Fielding in March, got about four pages in and put it down to start something else that needed to be read and there it sat, UNTIL I was prompted to pick it up again by A who is listening to it. Now he is waaaaay past me and my goal is to catch up (which I won’t be able to but has gotten me to start reading and pronto) and now I’m quite into the book. It was THE BOOK last year, so plenty of you have probably read it. I’m a little over 100 pages in so far and, like everyone else says, you do not have to love baseball to read this book; it doesn’t hurt, but it’s not only about that. It’s also about reading, and learning, and hard work, and friendship… at least so far.

And today, I will be picking up The Hound of the Baskervilles to read the first 20 pages which we will discuss on Friday.

What are YOU reading, thinking of reading, just finished reading?

The Hound of the Baskervilles :: Sign Ups & Starting Post

During May we’ll be reading The Hound of the Baskervilles by Arthur Conan Doyle for our Read-a-Long. A little mystery and intrigue to be finished in one month – after a long and thinky three month commitment. Who’s in?

hound-basker

Please note: I would greatly appreciate you reading through “How It Works” at the bottom of the page before signing on… it’s most helpful to me to have you do so. 

Quick Facts About the Read-a-Long:

  • You do not have to be a book blogger to join.
  • We will be reading the book in May (five weeks), with the first discussion happening on Friday, May 3rd/ the book is roughly 170 pages (depending on which edition you read) so that’s roughly 34 pages a week; about 5 pages a day.
  • Don’t be intimidated. We will be going at a slow pace and discussing the book throughout our reading. The discussions are quite fun, and make the reading process very enjoyable!

What is The Hound of the Baskervilles about?  

The Hound of the Baskervilles is the third of the four crime novels written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle featuring the detective Sherlock Holmes. Originally serialised in The Strand Magazine from August 1901 to April 1902, it is set largely on Dartmoor in Devon in England’s West Country and tells the story of an attempted murder inspired by the legend of a fearsome, diabolical hound.
In 2003 the book was listed on the BBC’s The Big Read poll of the UK’s “best-loved novel.” (via Wikipedia)

About the author, Arthur Conan Doyle:

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was a Scottish physician and writer, most noted for his stories about the detective Sherlock Holmes, generally considered milestones in the field of crime fiction, and for the adventures of Professor Challenger. He was a prolific writer whose other works include fantasy and science fiction stories, plays, romances, poetry, non-fiction and historical novels…. more

Please let me know in the comments section of this post if you are interested! Hope you’ll join us, the more the merrier! Below is a break down of  the reading schedule. Our first discussion will start THIS FRIDAY, May 3rd). Please take care to sign up with the EXACT name you are using for the rest of the read-a-long (meaning, you will be commenting using that name only for the rest of the read-a-long, see below in “How it Works” for information on why that is important). 

***

The following is the reading and posting schedule for this read-a-long. Please note, we will be reading roughly 34 pages per week (about 5 pages a day). Because it is always easier for us to stop at chapters (rather than on page numbers, because of different editions), I’ve had to round to the nearest chapter each week. Please look at the week’s page amount to best plan your reading in order to keep up.

Schedule:

Beginning Today and ending Friday, 31st. 

READING SCHEDULE:

Week #/ Where to Stop (For example, in week one STOP and place your bookmark at Chapter IV.)

Week One/ Chapter IV
Week Two/ Chapter VII
Week Three/ Chapter X
Week Four/ Chapter XIII
Week Five/The End

POSTING SCHEDULE:

Post #/ date discussion post will be up on blog:

Start-Up Post/ Today!
Week One/ May 3rd
Week Two/ May 10th
Week Three/ May 17th
Week Four/   May 24th
Week Five/ May 31st (Final Review)

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each week to share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Read-a-Long discussion (see below for more information).**

How it Works:

  1. Each week, on Friday, I will post my thoughts about the week’s reading. You will have from Friday through the following Thursday to post yours. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “This is my off week — I am catching up!” Please note that, in order to be counted, your offering to the discussion must be about the current weeks’ reading, not about past weeks. ***For all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  2. As these Read-a-Longs grow, so do the amount of people who participate – yay, all the more fun!!! Also, all the more keeping track of who is still reading. As you know – if you have been absent from discussion for two weeks, you will be removed from the list. However, now, in order to get back on the list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) Consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list. Am I trying to be mean? Absolutely not! I LOVE having you all read a long. It is, however, a lot of work to keep track of who’s still reading. To keep taking names off and putting them back on the list becomes tedious. Most importantly though, consistency is good for the group; we tend to get to know each other through discussions and rely on the conversation to keep us reading. Since I don’t do these read-a-longs to gain followers (I do them because the benefit of reading certain books with a group of dedicated people is often superior to reading them alone), I prefer to have a committed group – even if it is smaller. Reading with undedicated people is worst of all, which is why I care less about numbers and more about dedication to the book and the discussions. (Bonus! At the end of each read-a-long, those who have completed the entire read-a-long are eligible to be entered into the giveaway that correlates to the book… another reason why it is important for me to keep up with who is reading.)
  3. If you are a blogger, feel free to post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted. This is to make sure that our conversation is easily accessible to everyone who is reading, and also to keep it from becoming disjointed.
  4. Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.

Crime and Punishment :: Week Twelve (Final Review)

9781593080815_p0_v1_s260x420

Welcome to the Crime and Punishment read-a-long! We’re reading this book throughout February, March, and April. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

Week Twelve: The End

Discussion:

YOU MADE IT!!!

Congratulations. Good work everyone! Some of you, who have been reading with us for awhile, know that sometimes at the end of books like this – it’s incredibly hard to sum them up… particularly when you have taken three months to read them. You’ve formed a relationship with the book, the authors, the characters; that’s hard to boil down.

How do you feel? Relieved? Sad? Encouraged for having finished? Will you read another Dostoyevsky in the future? Was this what you expected?

I want to thank you all for reading along. I want to especially thank Jackie and Ashley for picking up the reins and REALLY helping me with this read-a-long, and I also want to thank Susan for her contribution!

(Next up is The Hounds of the Baskervilles by Arthur Conan Doyle… I’ll have the sign ups and starting post up on Monday.)

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
Mary Ann
jackiemania
Ashley
chezjulie
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Susan E
Cindy
PiaM
Maria
Debra E.
Roberta
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Heidi’sbooks
threewhales
Lara Newell
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
sarahdulitz
sawcat
Nose in a book
Rachel
Nancy H
jaynesbooks
Stewart
Emily’s Reading Room
Sarah M
thetruebookaddict
ramblingreader
Ninjy
kheenand

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


Perceptions

You’re going to wonder what the above video has to do with reading. Not much, exactly, but there is a theme that carries over. Recently, a friend wanted to sketch me. I said no, explaining that I was nervous. It sounded silly at the time, my explanation being that seeing a drawing that someone makes of you is seeing yourself through their eyes… and what if what they see is not how you want them to see you. Then this week, someone forwarded me this video (of which I had heard about but not seen), and it made me feel a little better because it was showcasing what I had been trying to articulate; we can never see ourselves the way that others do.

What’s interesting about this is that it translates to more than looks. What do we tell people when they ask what we watch on TV? Does the answer change because of who is asking? Do you emphasis the news programs and cut out the reality shows if you’re trying to impress the person? And what about your books? Which are the ones you have on prominent display in the public rooms of your house? I imagine they are the books that you are proud to have read. Are they tomes, classics, beautiful, impressive? Or do you display your escapist books; the ones you read when you need some mindless entertainment? Are your self-help books on the bookshelf in the dining room for your guests to peruse, or are they tucked away in your bedroom (or even closet)?

(What an interesting thing to think about… how others see us versus how we see ourselves, and the effort, whether subconscious or not, to portray a certain image to the public. )

Happy Monday!

Screen Shot 2013-04-21 at 7.28.17 PM

Today’s post isn’t about books (sorry!), but rather quick announcement. I told you I’ve been helping on another project and it’s ready! The first post will be up at 8:00 am PST today. There will be some fun things going on and new ways to connect… you’ll get to see the non-bookish side of me (believe it or not there IS one). ;)

Come see us here!

Crime and Punishment :: Week Eleven

9781593080815_p0_v1_s260x420

Welcome to the Crime and Punishment read-a-long! We’re reading this book throughout February, March, and April. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

Week Eleven: Read to Part 6, Chapter 8

Discussion:

jackiemania  is leading the discussion this week. Thanks Jacqueline!

Oh Svidrigailov, Svidrigailov, Svidrigailov! Did anyone else hear the song Sympathy for the Devil by the Rolling Stones every time he walked into a chapter?

Since we are so close to the end of the book, I though we could have a little (extra!) fun this week. We know all of the characters pretty well by now. Let’s play what song exemplifies each character! Raskolnikov? Dunya? Sonya? Luzhin? Razumihin? Anyone else? Give it a try! There are no wrong answers and we can have multiples for each character.

I can’t help myself to do one more — for Katerina Ivanova: the entire album Live Through This by Hole. Courtney Love in a whirlwind circa 1994 — can you see it?

I also have two questions for you regarding this week’s reading.

What does Svidrigailov’s suicide say about Raskolnikov’s… inability to commit suicide (or tenacity to live)?

What does Dunya’s inability to kill Svidrigailov say about Raskolnikov’s ability to kill?

Anything else that you’d like to talk about? I hope some of you talk about Svidrigailov’s nightmares (!!!)

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
Mary Ann
jackiemania
Ashley
chezjulie
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Susan E
Cindy
PiaM
Maria
Debra E.
Roberta
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Heidi’sbooks
threewhales
Lara Newell
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
sarahdulitz
sawcat
Nose in a book
Rachel
Nancy H
jaynesbooks
Stewart
Emily’s Reading Room
Sarah M
thetruebookaddict
ramblingreader
Ninjy
kheenand

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


Classics Club Question: Who is your favorite literary hero?

More_Images_Rooney_Mara_Dragon_Tattoo_Lisbeth_Salander_Arrive_Online_1294958835

Next catch up question for The Classics Club: Who is hands-down the best literary hero, in your opinion? Likewise, who is the best heroine?

I’m gathering that since this is asked by the Classics Club, it is meant to be someone from a classic book, but mine isn’t. So, don’t know if this is cheating or not – but it’s the truth. My favorite literary heroine is Lisbeth Salander.

Whenever I tell people how much I love the books and movies (all original versions and US version of the first) they must think I am a man hating, crazy woman. (I’m not, by the way.) But here’s the thing… Lisbeth is a superhero, so it’s hard not to find her heroic. She’s the modern day female batman. Seriously (think about it). So, maybe I’m a superhero dork or a sucker for a vigilante, but she wins hands down. And the best part is that although she can do some powerful self-defense, her real super power is her brain… and, well, that may just be my favorite part about her.

There’s really not much else to say other than to ask… who’s your literary hero or heroine?

Happy Monday!

f506c119595443bd46fbc6a747f4d06a

How was your weekend? Any good reading get done? I’ve caved and started Beautiful Creatures. It started slowly, but as soon as that first (literal) storm hit, I was hooked. I still haven’t made an abundance of time for personal reading – but I have been inching along with this one. It would be the perfect book for a long plane ride or a day at the beach. Pretty brainless, but entertaining… just what I need at the moment.

What are you reading?

Crime and Punishment :: Week Ten

9781593080815_p0_v1_s260x420

Welcome to the Crime and Punishment read-a-long! We’re reading this book throughout February, March, and April. You can see the reading schedule and guidelines on the Starting Post Page.

Week Ten: Read to Part 6, Chapter 4

Discussion:

Susan E.  is leading the discussion this week. Thanks Susan!

Oh, Fyodor!  What a week we’ve had in St Petersburg, with Katerina Ivanovna racing madly around the streets with her children.  (I think I feel sorrier for those children than anyone else in the book.)

When Katerina Ivanovna finally dies from her consumption, her final words “The nag’s been overdriven ….Too much strain.” flashed this reader back  to Raskolnikov’s earlier dream. Oh, Katerina Ivanovna.  Then, the mysterious Svidrigailov turns up in the nick of time to rescue Katerina’s children, save Sonya from “the quagmire, because she’s a nice girl, isn’t she?” and pay for the funeral.  ”All this bother–that is, the funeral and the rest of it–I will take upon myself.  It’s a matter of money, you know, and as I told you, I have some to spare.”  (unlike everyone else in the story). What is up with this guy, Svidrigailov?

Finally, at this point, it seems everyone knows Raskolnikov’s crime:  Razmukhin, the man in the street, Svidrigailov, Sonya, and now Porfiry Petrovich. Porfiry lays his cards on the table, or does he?  What is the “little trace” he refers to?  Does anyone have any ideas?

Porfiry seems to respect and even like Raskolnikov despite everything.  ”I, too, can well understand how it must be for a man to drag all this with him when he’s aggrieved but at the same time proud, domineering, and impatient–above all, impatient. In any case, sir, I regard you as a most noble man, and even as having the rudiments of magnanimity, though I do not agree with you in all your convictions, which I consider my duty to announce beforehand, directly, and with complete frankness, for above all I have no wish to deceive.  Having come to know you, I feel an attachment to you.” Porfiry seems to have a good read on Raskolnikov.  But more importantly for this week’s discussion, how do you feel about Raskolnikov at this point?  And should he confess?

Who’s Reading Along:

Meg @ A Bookish Affair
Mary Ann
jackiemania
Ashley
chezjulie
Ian Cann (@thebeercolonel)
Susan E
Cindy
PiaM
Maria
Debra E.
Roberta
Patty @ A tale of three cities
Heidi’sbooks
threewhales
Lara Newell
Melody @ Fingers & Prose
sarahdulitz
sawcat
Nose in a book
Rachel
Nancy H
jaynesbooks
Stewart
Emily’s Reading Room
Sarah M
thetruebookaddict
ramblingreader
Ninjy
kheenand

** Please don’t forget to come to this blog each Friday and share your thoughts in the comments section of the weekly Crime and Punishment discussion (see below for more information).**

 

Friendly Reminders:

  • If you are participating and I don’t have you on this list, please let me know in the comments section. I did not include people who said ‘maybe’ so if you have changed your mind and are definitely reading along with us, let me know so I can add you. Also, if you are not going to be able to join us anymore please let me know and I will take you off the list.
  • Comments from the previous week’s reading will be closing Thursday afternoon (before the next discussion takes place on Friday). If you would like to be part of the discussion, please remember to comment before then.
  • Each week, on Friday, share your thoughts about the previous week’s reading. If you are stuck on what to comment about, you can respond to my post or others’ comments. Regardless, you MUST check in each week (two weeks without a response and you will be taken off of the list — see below for details on why). You may have only one “off week” (which may not be the last week of reading for obvious reasons) and still be kept on the list, but you must let me know in the comment section by saying something like, “I’m catching up,” or “I’m still reading.” ***for all week’s discussions please refrain from posting ahead, even if you have read ahead, as to not spoil the book for others***
  • If you are a blogger you may post a link to your blog if you are posting about each of the each week’s reading. If I, or other readers, have extra time we will gladly try to visit your blog; however, you must make sure to share your thoughts here on this blog, and be part of the main conversation or your comment will not be counted.
  • If you go for two weeks without commenting in my weekly update comments section, I will assume you are no longer participating and will take you off of the list (*NEW GUIDELINE*, in order to get back onthe list, you need to a.) Have missed no more than two weeks of discussion, b.) Let me know you would like to be on the list again, and c.) consistently be part of the discussion for the next two weeks after requesting to be put back on the list.). This is in no way to be discouraging, but helps to keep the read-a-long organized (and helps me remember who’s completed what read-a-long). Thanks!


Classics Club Question: Who is Your Favorite Brontë, and Why?

e6f8d1acfe4e96fbd3d8d8f4b71eb738

I’m behind on The Classics Club questions, so over the next two Wednesdays I’ll catch up. Last month, the question was: “Who was your favorite Brontë, and why?”

I admit, I haven’t read anything by Anne (though I will later this year for the October Read-a-Long, when we read Agnes Grey), so technically I’m not allowed to include her – but perhaps the fact that I have left her until last in my reading of the sisters points to my level of interest (that or it’s just because she’s the least famous).

Charlotte, is wonderful. She’s a beautiful writer – soulful, and practical; responsible and long-suffering. Maybe the most relatable sister?

But it’s Emily I adore. I think because she is so raw and her work so controversial;  either you love it or hate it (I happen to love it). She’s morbid and fierce, and her romantic side is not the dainty kind expected of women but more of an unexpected shocking romanticism, which feels no less romantic to me than a style that would be categorized as more feminine. In fact, because I am not a typical romantic, I think I love her all the more.

How about you, who is your favorite Brontë, and why?